Skip to content

Pfizer’s Tax Inversion

December 15, 2015

Pfizer did something very few have been able to accomplish – they got Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump to express similar opinions.  However, they are both wrong.

Pfizer’s recent merger with Allergan and the move of its corporate headquarters to Ireland with the larger Pfizer merging into the smaller Allergan is known as a tax inversion.  Substantial U.S. taxes will be saved with this maneuver.  Nothing illegal was done and applicable provisions of the U. S. Tax Code have been complied with.  I believe it is the responsibility of publicly owned corporations to do what they could legally do to reduce their taxes.

I have no comment about the specific tax actions Pfizer is taking but I am upset that these two leading candidates and others that voiced dismay along with demands that Pfizer not do it and pay more taxes than they should.  I believe it is unpatriotic to try to force or cajole businesses to pay more tax than the law permits.

Our tax code is convoluted and has many things in it that are not fair and somewhat confiscatory that informed taxpayers try to avoid.  There are also many loopholes smart taxpayers try to take advantage of.  Congress enacted and the President signed into law every one of the provisions of the tax code.  We have a terrible tax code but in spite of that our system seems to work quite well.  Prominent public figures that assert these sort of negative comments do not add to the climate of voluntary compliance.

I also believe that those uttering the negative comments do not have any concept of how complicated and convoluted the tax laws are.  A basic test for this is that they do not prepare their own tax returns; the  reason being is that their returns are too complicated, they are not trained in taxes and that they feel that by doing it themselves they might miss a loophole or a benefit they are entitled to!

Let Pfizer have their benefits and if the complainers can, let them work, if they become able to, to make the tax code fairer and more equitable and less complicated.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. Carl Casazza permalink
    December 15, 2015 2:37 pm

    Well said. Fix the system and don’t complain about those that take advantage of the opportunities.

  2. December 15, 2015 4:40 pm

    Ed you must be a scholar of Judge Learned Hand. Some of his opinions in tax cases echo your thoughts.

    “Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.”
    – Helvering v. Gregory, 69 F.2d 809, 810-11 (2d Cir. 1934).

    “Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.”
    – Commissioner v. Newman, 159 F2d 848 (1947).

  3. 6hawthorne permalink
    December 16, 2015 12:55 pm

    good article

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: